From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Copland

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 19, 1941
32 N.E.2d 23 (Ohio 1941)

Opinion

No. 28480

Decided February 19, 1941.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Attorneys at law — Disbarment — Municipal Court Judge wrote and caused publication of fictitious opinion — False information given as to legal education — In answer to questionnaire relating to qualifications for office — Impeachment not exclusive remedy — Section 24, Article II, Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. James C. Connell and Mr. Howell Leuck, for appellant, David Copland.

Mr. Adrian G. Newcomb, Mr. Isador Grossman and Mr. Thomas A. Burke, Jr., for appellee.


It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Copland

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 19, 1941
32 N.E.2d 23 (Ohio 1941)
Case details for

In re Copland

Case Details

Full title:IN RE COPLAND

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 19, 1941

Citations

32 N.E.2d 23 (Ohio 1941)
32 N.E.2d 23

Citing Cases

In re Watson

There is much support for this position. In Re Spriggs, 36 Ariz. 262, 284 P. 521; In Re McGarry, 380 Ill.…