From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Concrete Pipe

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Dec 24, 1968
297 F. Supp. 1125 (J.P.M.L. 1968)

Opinion

No. 12.

December 24, 1968.

Before ALFRED P. MURRAH, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel.


OPINION AND ORDER


On October 14, 1968 certain plaintiffs in actions then pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Southern District of New York filed a motion with the Panel requesting the transfer of twenty-three cases to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. When this matter was set for hearing, we included four additional cases for consideration for transfer to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania or to another district or districts. One of these additional cases, State of New Mexico, et al. v. American Pipe Construction Co., et al., is presently pending in the District of New Mexico.

Prior to the hearing, all parties in this case, with one exception, filed a joint motion to transfer it to an appropriate west coast court and to assign it to the Honorable Martin Pence for pretrial purposes. Even assuming, as the parties now urge, that the claims in this case arise from the alleged west of the Rockies conspiracy and that some of the factual issues present in it are common to the Ninth Circuit cases, we decline to order such a transfer. In view of the fact that pretrial proceedings are nearly complete in the Ninth Circuit cases, we do not believe that transfer of The State of New Mexico case at this time will promote the just and efficient conduct of these actions.

At the hearing, counsel suggested that the case be transferred to the Central District of California.

It is therefore ordered that the motion to transfer this case to the Central District of California and to assign it to the Honorable Martin Pence for pretrial proceedings be and the same is hereby denied.


Summaries of

In re Concrete Pipe

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Dec 24, 1968
297 F. Supp. 1125 (J.P.M.L. 1968)
Case details for

In re Concrete Pipe

Case Details

Full title:In re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Antitrust Litigation…

Court:Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Date published: Dec 24, 1968

Citations

297 F. Supp. 1125 (J.P.M.L. 1968)

Citing Cases

In re Concrete Pipe

Judge Pence's familiarity with this litigation, the prior discovery and the problems relating thereto, is…