From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clifton v. Passaic Cty. Bd. of Tax

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 1972
287 A.2d 449 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued February 7, 1972 —

Decided February 22, 1972.

On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Frank A. Carlet argued the cause for appellant, City of Clifton ( Mr. Arthur J. Sullivan, Jr., City Counsel. Messrs. Breslin and Monaghan for appellant, Borough of Ridgefield, et al; Mr. John A. Schepisi, of counsel.)

Mr. Richard M. Conley, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Elias Abelson, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).


The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in its opinion ( 114 N.J. Super. 253). reasons expressed in its opinion ( 114 N.J. Super. 253).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7 For reversal — None.


Summaries of

In re Clifton v. Passaic Cty. Bd. of Tax

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 1972
287 A.2d 449 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

In re Clifton v. Passaic Cty. Bd. of Tax

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 1972

Citations

287 A.2d 449 (N.J. 1972)
287 A.2d 449

Citing Cases

City of Trenton v. Mercer Cty. Bd. of Taxation

Appellant, apparently recognizing this, argues that the Legislature's choice of one method of apportionment…

Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation v. Newark

It further provided for the distribution of revenues received from this source among municipalities "in…