From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Claudette

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Jul 10, 1937
21 Cal.App.2d 688 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)

Opinion

Docket No. 1969.

July 10, 1937.

PROCEEDING in Habeas Corpus to secure release from custody. Writ granted.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Raine Ewell for Petitioner.

Raymond D. Williamson for Respondent.


Petitioner was arrested on April 17, 1937, in San Francisco on a warrant issued upon a complaint charging petty theft. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days and to pay a fine of $250. [1] At the time of the rendition of the judgment and sentence imposing the fine no alternative of a further imprisonment for nonpayment of the fine was made and no imprisonment of petitioner was ordered by the court for nonpayment of said fine. The time of the imprisonment expired on May 14, 1937, at which time the court made and signed an additional order that petitioner be imprisoned for another thirty days or until the fine was paid, not exceeding $8.33 a day, said sum amounting to the $250 fine originally imposed. The court was without jurisdiction to make such nunc pro tunc order or any further or additional imprisonment of petitioner, it having exhausted its jurisdiction under the original judgment.

The writ is granted and the petitioner discharged.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.


Summaries of

In re Claudette

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Jul 10, 1937
21 Cal.App.2d 688 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Case details for

In re Claudette

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of SWAMI CLAUDETTE for a Writ of Habeas…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Jul 10, 1937

Citations

21 Cal.App.2d 688 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
69 P.2d 1021

Citing Cases

People v. McAllister

This order was made after the defendant had been taken into custody and brought the case within the rule that…

In re Antazo

Prior to 1960 none of the cases appear to have involved challenges based upon a defendant's indigency. See,…