Summary
holding that Plan prohibiting amendment that would permit "trust corpus or income to be diverted to or revert to either of the employers or to be used for any purpose other than the exclusive benefit of the participants, or their beneficiaries" did not prohibit reversion of surplus to employer because the term "trust corpus or income" only applied to those assets necessary to insure full payment of Plan obligations
Summary of this case from Chait v. BernsteinOpinion
No. 78-1109.
September 18, 1978.
E.D.Pa., 441 F.Supp. 1128.
AFFIRMED