From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1945
36 S.E.2d 75 (N.C. 1945)

Opinion

(Filed 28 November, 1945.)

Appeal and Error §§ 4, 30e —

In habeas corpus, petitioner asking for release from arrest upon telephonic revocation of his parole, where it appears that on the hearing below that petitioner's parole had then been revoked in due form. G.S., 134-85, the legality of his arrest and detention is presently academic, hence motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss must be allowed.

HABEAS CORPUS proceedings, heard by Burney, J., in Chambers at Wilmington, N.C. 16 July, 1945. Here on petition for a writ of certiorari.

W. L. Farmer and Rodgers Rodgers for petitioner.

Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Tucker for respondent.


Petitioner was duly committed to the Jackson Training School. On 19 February, 1945, he was released on parole. On 12 July, 1945, acting on a telephonic revocation of the parole, the probation officer of New Hanover County ordered his arrest. Writ of habeas corpus, after hearing, was denied and petitioner was recommitted. Thereupon, on his petition, writ of certiorari issued from this Court.


On 16 July, 1945, the date of the hearing below, petitioner's parole was revoked in due form. G.S., 134-85. He is now lawfully detained. The legality of his original arrest and detention is presently academic. Hence the motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss must be allowed. Cochran v. Rowe, ante, 645; Martin v. Sloan, 69 N.C. 128; S. v. R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Waters v. Boyd, 179 N.C. 180, 102 S.E. 196; Trade Association v. Doughton, 192 N.C. 384, 135 S.E. 131; Board of Education v. Comrs. of Johnston, 198 N.C. 430, 152 S.E. 156; Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 217 N.C. 691, 9 S.E.2d 466.

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Burnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1945
36 S.E.2d 75 (N.C. 1945)
Case details for

In re Burnett

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM N. BURNETT, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1945

Citations

36 S.E.2d 75 (N.C. 1945)
36 S.E.2d 75

Citing Cases

Vandyke v. Insurance Co.

Affirmed. Cited: Waldo v. Wilson, 177 N.C. 462; Cochran v. Rowe, 225 N.C. 646.…

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educ.

See §§ 134-79 and 134-91. Cited in In re Burnett, 225 N.C. 646, 36 S.E.2d 75 (1945). §…