Opinion
660
April 4, 2002.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered October 4, 2000, which denied the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund denying petitioner's application for an accidental disability retirement pension, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
ELLIOT I. SUSSER, for petitioner-appellant.
ELIZABETH S. NATRELLA, for respondents-respondents.
Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Wallach, Marlow, JJ.
Supreme Court correctly ruled that respondent Board of Trustees' determination, denying petitioner accidental disability retirement benefits as a consequence of a tie vote, was not arbitrary and capricious because there was some credible evidence to support the Board's conclusion that petitioner's disability was not caused by a service-related accident (see, Matter of Harris v. Safir, 284 A.D.2d 220, 221). In reaching its determination, the Board of Trustees properly relied upon the medically supported recommendation of respondent Medical Board of the Police Pension Fund, that petitioner's significant hearing loss in one ear was not precipitated by acoustic trauma attributable to the discharge of a firearm proximate to her (see, Matter of Meyer v. Bd. of Trustees, 90 N.Y.2d 139, 147).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.