From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 21, 1959
156 A.2d 700 (N.J. 1959)

Opinion

Argued November 23, 1959 —

Decided December 21, 1959.

Appeal from State Division of Tax Appeals.

Mr. David M. Perskie argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Perskie Perskie, attorneys).

Mr. Daniel J. Dowling argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Murray Fredericks, attorney).


The matter is remanded to the Division of Tax Appeals with the following directions:

(1) To examine the local assessors of Atlantic City in office for the years 1954 to 1957, inclusive, with respect to the percentage of true value which they used in making or revising assessments relating to real property (or classes thereof) including new construction and subdivisions;

(2) To receive such further testimony as the parties may offer with respect to the subject matter described in (1);

(3) To make such further findings as may be appropriate in the light of the additional proofs, including the effect, if any, of such findings upon the judgments under review;

(4) To return the additional proofs and findings to this court.

Jurisdiction of the causes is retained.

For remandment — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

In re Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 21, 1959
156 A.2d 700 (N.J. 1959)
Case details for

In re Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEALS OF KENTS 2124 ATLANTIC AVE., INC., KENTS 1214…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 21, 1959

Citations

156 A.2d 700 (N.J. 1959)
156 A.2d 700

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

Newman v. Borough of Fair Lawn, 31 N.J. 279, 157 A.2d 314 (1960). In re the Appeals of Rents 2124 Atl. Ave.,…

City of Passaic v. Botany Mills, Inc.

The city and the taxpayer are not at liberty to stipulate for assessments contrary to the lawful standard,…