From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Amaravathi Limited Partnership

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Jul 29, 2009
Bankruptcy Case No. 09-32754, CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-1908 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Bankruptcy Case No. 09-32754, CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-1908.

July 29, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This case is before the Court on Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Unopposed Request for Certification of Direct Appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) [Doc. # 3]. Section 158(d)(2) provides for certification of an appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court directly to the United States Court of Appeals if the district court certifies any one of the following: (1) the appeal involves a question of law for which there is no controlling decision from this circuit or that involves a matter of public importance; (2) the appeal involves a question of law requiring the resolution of conflicting decisions; or (3) an immediate appeal may materially advance the progress of the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2).

The Court finds that all three factors recommend certification of this matter for direct appeal to the Fifth Circuit. The appeal involves inter alia whether, in the context of an absolute assignment by an assignor who later files bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy Code's definition of "property of the estate" controls over the absolute assignment of rents that, under state law, transferred actual title of the rents to the assignee. This is an important question as to which there are no decisions from the Fifth Circuit or the United States Supreme Court. The issue also has significant public importance because many loan agreements include provisions assigning rents similar to the one in the Loan Documents in the case on appeal. The Bankruptcy Court's holding in the case on appeal is in conflict with a decision by the Third Circuit holding that, once an assignment of rents passes title to those rents under state law, the rents are not property of the bankruptcy estate. See Sovereign Bank v. Schwab, 414 F.3d 450, 453 (3d Cir. 2005). As recognized by the Bankruptcy Court, a direct appeal is likely to advance the progress of the underlying bankruptcy cases because the Bankruptcy Court's decision regarding Debtors' right to use rents will form the basis for the Debtors' reorganization and will be relevant to confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization. For all these reasons, the Court concludes that certification of a direct appeal to the Fifth Circuit pursuant to § 158(d)(2) is appropriate. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Unopposed Request for Certification of Direct Appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) [Doc. # 3] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that this case is STAYED AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending a decision by the Fifth Circuit whether to authorize the direct appeal. It is further

ORDERED that Unopposed Motion to Stay Briefing Schedule [Doc. # 4] is GRANTED to the extent that any briefing in the district court is STAYED.


Summaries of

In re Amaravathi Limited Partnership

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Jul 29, 2009
Bankruptcy Case No. 09-32754, CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-1908 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 29, 2009)
Case details for

In re Amaravathi Limited Partnership

Case Details

Full title:In re: AMARAVATHI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Debtor WELLS FARGO BANK…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

Bankruptcy Case No. 09-32754, CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-1908 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

QuarterNorth Energy LLC v. Atl. Mar. Servs. (In re Fieldwood Energy III LLC)

A district court may, “acting on its own motion or on the request of a party to the judgment, order, or…