From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Am. Apparel, Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2012
Case No. 10-CV-6576 MMM (RCx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-CV-6576 MMM (RCx)

10-15-2012

IN RE AMERICAN APPAREL, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

FARUOT & FARUOL, LLP By: David E. Bower (119546) LAW OFFICE OF DOUGLAS J. CAMPION Douglas J. Campion OFFICE OF DEBRAS, GOODMAN P.C. Debra Goodmau Co-Cnunsel for Plaintiffs SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FELD, LTP By: Harriet S. Posner Counsel for Nominal Defendant American Apparel, Inc. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & By: Hyongsoo n Counsel for Defendants Mark Samson, Keith Miller. Mark A. Thornton, Robert Greene and Allan Mayer O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Counsel for Defendants Dov Charney and Action Kowalewski SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP By: Chet a. Kropenberg Counsel for Defendant Neil Richardson


JS-6


[PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT


Judge: Hon. Margaret M. Morrow

Defendants having moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint, and the Court, on July 31, 2012, having issued an Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss; Denying Nominal Defendant American Apparel's Motion To Stay [Doc. 63, Filed 7/31/12] (the "Order"), which Order permitted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by August 30, 2012, and plaintiffs, having declined to file an amended complaint and moving for entry of final judgment on August 29, 2012, from which to appeal the Order, it is hereby,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order, with no amended complaint having been filed, the motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative complaint is granted and this action is dismissed.

______________

Margaret M. Morrow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

FARUOT & FARUOL, LLP

______________

By: David E. Bower (119546)

LAW OFFICE OF DOUGLAS J. CAMPION

Douglas J. Campion

OFFICE OF DEBRAS, GOODMAN P.C.

Debra Goodmau

Co-Cnunsel for Plaintiffs

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FELD, LTP

______________

By: Harriet S. Posner

Counsel for Nominal Defendant American Apparel, Inc.

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LTP

By: Hyongsoon Kim

Counsel for Defendants Mark Samson, Keith Miller.

Mark A. Thornton, Robert Greene and Allan Mayer

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

By: _____

Counsel for Defendants Dov Charney and Action Kowalewski

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

By: Chet a. Kropenberg

Counsel for Defendant Neil Richardson


Summaries of

In re Am. Apparel, Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2012
Case No. 10-CV-6576 MMM (RCx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

In re Am. Apparel, Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE AMERICAN APPAREL, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-CV-6576 MMM (RCx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2012)

Citing Cases

Solution Trust v. 2100 Grand LLC (In re AWTR Liquidation Inc.)

The plaintiff argues persuasively that, to the extent that "group pleading" is a disfavored legal concept at…