From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Oct 13, 2017
No. 118 MM 2017 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2017)

Opinion

No. 118 MM 2017

10-13-2017

IN RE: A.N.L. (APPEAL OF A.B.) PETITION OF: MICHAEL B. SMITH, ESQUIRE


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2017, upon consideration of the Application to Withdraw, it is noted that no Petition for Allowance of Appeal was advanced within the filing period. See Pa.R.A.P. 105(b) (providing that the time period for filing an allocatur petition may not be enlarged). Moreover, there is no other allocatur-related submission before this Court.

As the application is not related to a filing pending in this tribunal, there is no evident jurisdictional basis for its consideration. See Reading Anthracite Co. v. Rich, 577 A.2d 881 (Pa. 1990) (observing that the timeliness of an appeal is jurisdictional). Accordingly, the Application to Withdraw is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

In re

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Oct 13, 2017
No. 118 MM 2017 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2017)
Case details for

In re

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: A.N.L. (APPEAL OF A.B.) PETITION OF: MICHAEL B. SMITH, ESQUIRE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 13, 2017

Citations

No. 118 MM 2017 (Pa. Oct. 13, 2017)