From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Matter of R.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Apr 14, 2010
No. 04-09-00553-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2010)

Opinion

No. 04-09-00553-CV

Delivered and Filed: April 14, 2010.

Appealed from the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2009JUV01414A, Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding.

Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction.

Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


R.T. entered into a plea bargain with the State on the State's Original Petition Alleging Delinquent Conduct. In accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreement, the trial court signed an order of disposition placing R.T. on probation in the care, custody, and control of his mother. R.T. subsequently filed this appeal asserting: (1) the trial court erred in accepting his plea since the only evidence against him was uncorroborated accomplice witness statements; and (2) trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance of counsel. We first consider the State's challenge to our jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

"A child who enters a plea . . . may not appeal an order of the juvenile court entered under Section 54.03, 54.04, or 54.05 if the court makes a disposition in accordance with the agreement between the state and the child regarding the disposition of the case, unless: (1) the court gives the child permission to appeal; or (2) the appeal is based on a matter raised by written motion filed before the proceeding in which the child entered the plea." TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 56.01(n) (Vernon Supp. 2000). Compliance with section 56.01(n) is jurisdictional, and the failure to abide by its terms subjects an appeal to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See In re R.J.D., No. 04-06-00495-CV, 2006 WL 3497671, at *1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Dec.6, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re B.N.C., No. 04-02-00788-CV, 2003 WL 1232997, at *1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Mar. 19, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.); see also Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 648 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (enforcing statutory limits on right to appeal in criminal case). Because nothing in this record indicates that the trial court gave R.T. permission to appeal or that his appeal is based on a written motion filed before R.T. entered his plea, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In Matter of R.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Apr 14, 2010
No. 04-09-00553-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2010)
Case details for

In Matter of R.T.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF R.T

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Apr 14, 2010

Citations

No. 04-09-00553-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2010)