From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Interest of R.H

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jun 23, 1989
441 N.W.2d 233 (Wis. 1989)

Opinion

Nos. 88-0372, 88-0605.

Argued March 1, 1989. —

Decided June 23, 1989.

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed.

For the respondents-petitioners, State of Wisconsin and LaCrosse County, the cause was argued by Sally L. Wellman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was Donald J. Hanaway, attorney general.

For the appellant, T.H., there was a brief and oral argument by Glenn L. Cushing, assistant state public defender.

For the appellant, L.H., there was a brief by Eugene R. Thompson, Madison, and oral argument by Daniel Hildebrand, Madison.


(Affirming 147 Wis.2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct.App. 1988).)


The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, 147 Wis.2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct.App. 1988), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice NATHAN S. HEFFERNAN, Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, and Justice WILLIAM G. CALLOW being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice LOUIS J. CECI being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

In Interest of R.H

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jun 23, 1989
441 N.W.2d 233 (Wis. 1989)
Case details for

In Interest of R.H

Case Details

Full title:IN the INTEREST OF R.H., III, a person under the age of 18: T.H.…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 23, 1989

Citations

441 N.W.2d 233 (Wis. 1989)
441 N.W.2d 233

Citing Cases

Waukesha County v. Darlene R

The time requirements for holding a factfinding hearing and a dispositional hearing under §§ 48.30(7) and…

State v. Michael S

B.J.N., 162 Wis. 2d at 646; S.D.R., 109 Wis. 2d at 577. See In re R.H., 147 Wis. 2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16…