From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irrigation District

Supreme Court of California.Department One
Nov 17, 1916
173 Cal. 674 (Cal. 1916)

Opinion

L. A. No. 3774.

November 17, 1916.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Imperial County granting an injunction Pendente Lite. Louis W. Myers, Judge presiding.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A. Haines, and Haines Haines, for Appellants.

Valentine Newby, for Respondents.


This is an appeal by defendants from an order granting an injunction pendente lite. The injunction restrained the enforcement of an assessment levied by the board of directors of the Imperial Irrigation District. The trial of the action resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendants, and we have this day filed an opinion affirming such judgment. ( Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist., ante, p. 668, [ 161 P. 116].)

The judgment on the merits, which now becomes final, ended the life of the temporary injunction. The defendants have, accordingly, secured every substantial benefit which they could obtain by a reversal of the order which they seek to review by the present appeal. The rights of the parties would not be affected in any way by either an affirmance or a reversal of such order. In this state of facts, the questions presented are merely moot or academic, and the court will not exercise its appellate jurisdiction for their decision. ( Foster v. Smith, 115 Cal. 611, [47 P. 591]; Bradley v. Voorsanger, 143 Cal. 214, [ 76 P. 1031].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irrigation District

Supreme Court of California.Department One
Nov 17, 1916
173 Cal. 674 (Cal. 1916)
Case details for

Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irrigation District

Case Details

Full title:IMPERIAL LAND COMPANY (a Corporation), et al., Respondents, v. IMPERIAL…

Court:Supreme Court of California.Department One

Date published: Nov 17, 1916

Citations

173 Cal. 674 (Cal. 1916)
161 P. 119

Citing Cases

Davies v. Ramsdell

In such a case the court will not revise the propriety of the order. ( Hicks v. Davis, 4 Cal. 67; Imperial…