From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Icke v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2017
CASE NO. 1:16 CV 1208 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 2, 2017)

Summary

In Icke, the plaintiff argued the ALJ's finding that he could stand or walk for four hours in an eight-hour workday was legally incompatible with a "light work" limitation.

Summary of this case from Barron-Green v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:16 CV 1208

06-02-2017

Kevin Clark Icke, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Memorandum of Opinion and Order

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker (Doc. 15) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. No objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is hereby ACCEPTED.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When objections are made to a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews the case de novo. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides in pertinent part:

The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made in accordance with this rule. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

As stated in the Advisory Committee Notes, "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." In Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985), the Court held, "It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings."

DECISION

This Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finding no clear error, hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. In accordance with that recommendation, judgment is entered in favor of the Commissioner for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge and the Report and Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Patricia A. Gaughan

PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN

United States District Judge

Chief Judge Dated: 6/2/17


Summaries of

Icke v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2017
CASE NO. 1:16 CV 1208 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 2, 2017)

In Icke, the plaintiff argued the ALJ's finding that he could stand or walk for four hours in an eight-hour workday was legally incompatible with a "light work" limitation.

Summary of this case from Barron-Green v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Icke v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Kevin Clark Icke, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 2, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1:16 CV 1208 (N.D. Ohio Jun. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

Robert C .v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

It is not one or the other, because the courts recognize that there are a substantial number of jobs…

Moore v. Berryhill

Although Dr. Blaine's finding that Plaintiff could only walk or stand four hours in an eight-work day is more…