From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Andrulis Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. Florida
Mar 19, 2004
Case No. 5:03cv1-MCR/WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2004)

Summary

adopting magistrate judge's report and recommendation that Florida's whistleblower statute was inapplicable to an individual employed on a federal enclave

Summary of this case from Schiappa v. Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC

Opinion

Case No. 5:03cv1-MCR/WCS

March 19, 2004


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff previously has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Defendant's motion for summary judgment, doc. 15, is GRANTED as to count two, and count two is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant's motion to dismiss count three is GRANTED and count three is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. This case is remanded to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Andrulis Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. Florida
Mar 19, 2004
Case No. 5:03cv1-MCR/WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2004)

adopting magistrate judge's report and recommendation that Florida's whistleblower statute was inapplicable to an individual employed on a federal enclave

Summary of this case from Schiappa v. Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Andrulis Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, vs. ANDRULIS CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida

Date published: Mar 19, 2004

Citations

Case No. 5:03cv1-MCR/WCS (N.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2004)

Citing Cases

Schiappa v. Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC

Therefore, the NYSHRL does not apply on this federal enclave and is not enforceable as to BSA operations at…