From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HURT v. BAUER

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Apr 30, 1918
37 Cal.App. 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2174.

April 30, 1918.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. H. T. Dewhirst, Judge Presiding.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

C. Franklin Baxter, for Appellant.

Wm. M. Bowen, Benjamin E. Page, and Arthur C. Hurt, for Respondents.


This is an action for the recovery of money, judgment having gone for the plaintiffs and the defendant having appealed. At the time set for the oral argument, the respondent was granted leave to file a certified copy of a satisfaction of judgment said to have been filed in the action in the office of the clerk of the trial court. The certified copy has been filed since and it shows a satisfaction of the judgment in full. By the payment of the judgment the questions presented upon the appeal have become moot.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

HURT v. BAUER

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Apr 30, 1918
37 Cal.App. 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

HURT v. BAUER

Case Details

Full title:CHAS.E. HURT et al., Respondents, v. F. J. BAUER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Apr 30, 1918

Citations

37 Cal.App. 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
173 P. 601

Citing Cases

Reitano v. Yankwich

That sum was paid and a satisfaction of the judgment was filed.          Respondent Yankwich now seeks a…

Reitano v. Yankwich

There have been contrary statements. ( Hurt v. Bauer, 37 Cal.App. 109 [ 173 P. 601]; Morneault v. National…