From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huntley v. Superintendent

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 29, 2007
9:00-CV-191 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2007)

Summary

finding that information provided by a confidential informant was reliable and had veracity since the events occurred as the informant had predicted

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Ortiz

Opinion

9:00-CV-191.

January 29, 2007

KERRY HUNTLEY, Petitioner, Pro Se, 96-A-6846, Southport Correctional Facility, Pine City, NY.

STEVEN H. SCHWARTZ, ESQ., Asst. Attorney General, HON. ELIOT L. SPITZER, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Respondent, Department of Law, Albany, NY.


DECISION and ORDER


Petitioner, Kerry Huntley, brought this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By a report recommendation dated December 5, 2006, the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied and dismissed. Petitioner filed timely objections.

Based upon a de novo determination of the report and recommendation, including the portions to which petitioner objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rule 10, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the petition is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Huntley v. Superintendent

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 29, 2007
9:00-CV-191 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2007)

finding that information provided by a confidential informant was reliable and had veracity since the events occurred as the informant had predicted

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Ortiz
Case details for

Huntley v. Superintendent

Case Details

Full title:KERRY HUNTLEY, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Supt. of Southport Corr…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 29, 2007

Citations

9:00-CV-191 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2007)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Artus

Williams' mere disagreement with the outcome of the state courts' rulings "is not the equivalent of an…

U.S. v. Ortiz

See Exhibit B to the Gov't Opp. Fifth, the informant predicted the presence of numerous weapons, which were,…