From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2019
No. CV 17-6107-DOC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. CV 17-6107-DOC (AGR)

01-30-2019

DAMIAN J. HUNTER, Petitioner, v. STEWART SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court agrees with the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for stay is DENIED. DATED: January 30, 2019

/s/_________

DAVID O. CARTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hunter v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2019
No. CV 17-6107-DOC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Hunter v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:DAMIAN J. HUNTER, Petitioner, v. STEWART SHERMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2019

Citations

No. CV 17-6107-DOC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2019)

Citing Cases

T. P. Ry. Co. v. Newsome Williams

Testimony of special damages is not admissible in the absence of allegations specially setting out such…

Fournier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

General damages, that is, such as naturally, logically and necessarily result from the injury complained of,…