From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Kolken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 1975
49 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

September 22, 1975


In an action against an attorney to recover damages for malpractice, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 8, 1974, as denied his motion for summary judgment against plaintiff. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and motion for summary judgment against plaintiff granted. In our opinion, no material issues of fact were raised. The facts before Special Term mandated the grant of summary judgment to defendant. Defendant was discharged by plaintiff in August, 1969 and forwarded the file to plaintiff's new attorney on September 11, 1969. He cannot be liable for subsequent events. Plaintiff had until January, 1970 to proceed against the State and until January, 1971 to institute the medical malpractice action. Gulotta, P.J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hunt v. Kolken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 1975
49 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Hunt v. Kolken

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE R. HUNT, Respondent, v. ROBERT D. KOLKEN, Appellant. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP v. Coney on the Park, LLC

e the fact that Zlatopolsky, who identifies himself as the Manager of the Legal Department of Boymelgreen…

Piola Prop. Mgmt. v. Abrams, Fensterman, Festerman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP

Put another way, an attorney cannot be held liable for acts that occur following termination of the…