From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Connecticut

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 304 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.

No. 117, Misc.

Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 154 Conn. 517, 227 A.2d 69, vacated and remanded.

James W. Marshall for petitioner.

David B. Salzman for respondent.


The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).


Summaries of

Hunt v. Connecticut

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 304 (1968)
Case details for

Hunt v. Connecticut

Case Details

Full title:HUNT v . CONNECTICUT

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 10, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 304 (1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sims

392 U.S. 295, 88 S.Ct. 1922. In three of these cases, Hunt v. Connecticut, 392 U.S. 304, 88 S.Ct. 2063, 20…

State v. McLucas

The Bruton case holds that the introduction into evidence in a joint trial of a confession implicating the…