From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunsucker v. Fallin

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 30, 2017
2017 OK 84 (Okla. 2017)

Opinion

Case Number: 116131

10-30-2017

John HUNSUCKER, on behalf of himself and his clients; Bruce Edge, on behalf of himself and his clients; Charles Sifers, on behalf of himself and his clients; Stephan Fabian, on behalf of himself and his clients, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Mary FALLIN, Governor, in Her Official Capacity; the Honorable Senator Mike Schultz, Senate President Pro Tempore, in His Official Capacity; the Honorable Representative Charles Mccall, Speaker of the House, in His Official Capacity; Michael Thompson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Oklahoma Department of Public Safety ; David Prater, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County; Steve Kunzweiler, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Tulsa County; Respondents.


¶ 1 Petitioners challenge the constitutionality of the 2017 Impaired Driving Elimination Act 2, (S.B. No. 643). The effective date for all provisions of this Act is scheduled for November 1, 2017.

¶ 2 The Court possesses judicial discretion to grant temporary relief or relief on the merits, with an opinion to follow, in order to protect the rights of parties pending resolution of a judicial controversy when a short period of time occurs between oral argument and the time an event will occur concerning the merits of the controversy. In re Initiative Petition No. 314 , 1980 OK 174, 625 P.2d 595, 596 ; Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission , 1994 OK 142, 897 P.2d 1116, 1118-1119.

¶ 3 The Court assumes original jurisdiction for the purpose of issuing a temporary stay pending the litigation herein. The provisions of the 2017 Impaired Driving Elimination Act 2, (S.B. No. 643), including its effective date are hereby stayed. The 2017 Impaired Driving Elimination Act 2, (S.B. No. 643), shall not take effect on November 1, 2017, the provisions of the Act shall not be enforced during the present litigation, and they shall not be enforced until a future order or opinion of this Court so directs.

¶ 4 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 30 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017.

¶ 5 COMBS, C.J.; KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, EDMONDSON, COLBERT, and REIF, JJ., concur.

¶ 6 GURICH, V.C.J.; and WYRICK, J., dissent.


Summaries of

Hunsucker v. Fallin

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 30, 2017
2017 OK 84 (Okla. 2017)
Case details for

Hunsucker v. Fallin

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HUNSUCKER, on behalf of himself and his clients; BRUCE EDGE, on…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Oct 30, 2017

Citations

2017 OK 84 (Okla. 2017)
464 P.3d 135

Citing Cases

Hunsucker v. Fallin

We conclude the Impaired Driving Elimination Act 2 is unconstitutional in its entirety, and we need not…

Hunsucker v. Fallin

We conclude the Impaired Driving Elimination Act 2 is unconstitutional in its entirety, and we need not…