Opinion
Argued February 25, 1901
Decided March 5, 1901
H.C. Mandeville for motion.
Hiscock, Doheny, Williams Cowie opposed.
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hull v. Wilcox
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1901
59 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1901)
Summaries of
Hull v. Wilcox
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1901
59 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1901)
Case details for
Hull v. Wilcox
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE S. HULL, as Trustee for the Benefit of Third Mortgage Bondholders…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 5, 1901
Citations
59 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1901)
166 N.Y. 598
Citing Cases
Mercantile Trust Co. v. Hensey
The whole contract shows, in our opinion, that the certificate that the houses had been completed according…
American Express Co. v. MullinsThis relieved the company from further responsibility, and the owner can no longer complain of it because the…