holding that Section 110 does not violate equal protection by impermissibly discriminating between attorneys and non-attorneys since the disclosure of preparers social security numbers was rationally related to the legitimate government interest in facilitating the courts
Summary of this case from In re BonarrigoNo. 99-1083.
February 28, 2000.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 188 F. 3d 939.
holding that Section 110 does not violate equal protection by impermissibly discriminating between attorneys and non-attorneys since the disclosure of preparers social security numbers was rationally related to the legitimate government interest in facilitating the courts
Summary of this case from In re Bonarrigoapplying comparable balancing test
Summary of this case from State v. RussoFull title:HULL v. FALLON ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 28, 2000
Numerous courts have held, in a variety of cases where there was a question as to the entry of the Social…
State v. RussoIn re Crawford, 194 F.3d 954, 959 (9th Cir. 1999), cert. denied sub nom. Ferm v. United States Trustee, 528…