From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1925
104 So. 884 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 274.

June 30, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Limestone County; James E. Horton, Judge.

Ike Hughey was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals. Affirmed.

The following charge was given at the request of the state:

"I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that, if you believe from all the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant entered into the fight willingly in which Will Yarbrough lost his life, then he cannot invoke the doctrine of self-defense."

The following requested instruction was refused to the defendant:

"(5) Gentlemen of the jury, if you believe that the defendant, Hughey, committed the offense complained of in legitimate and necessary self-defense, he (Hughey) is entitled to an acquittal, and to exemption from criminal liability."

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The defendant was convicted of the offense of manslaughter in the first degree, and appeals.

It would serve no good purpose for us to discuss the evidence. That for the state tended to show the guilt of the defendant, as charged. That for the defendant tended to show his innocence. The court properly refused to give the general affirmative charge, duly requested, in defendant's behalf.

We have been furnished with no brief on behalf of appellant. However, as required by law, we have diligently searched the record, and have found no prejudicial error committed by the court trying the case. The few exceptions reserved on the admission or rejection of testimony have each been examined, and in each instance we find the trial court's action free from prejudicial error.

Written charge 5 refused to defendant was bad because of the use of the expression "self-defense." Collins v. State, 17 Ala. App. 186, 84 So. 417. The same is true of written refused charges 6 and 7.

Written refused charge 8 is bad in not requiring the jury's finding to be based on the evidence in the case. Edwards v. State, 205 Ala. 160, 87 So. 179.

The written charge given at the request of the state manifestly contained a correct statement of the law.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hughey v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1925
104 So. 884 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Hughey v. State

Case Details

Full title:HUGHEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1925

Citations

104 So. 884 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
104 So. 884

Citing Cases

Walters v. State

Defendant is not excused from retreating by reason of the fact that he was in his own automobile in the…