From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 21, 1981
662 F.2d 219 (4th Cir. 1981)

Summary

affirming district court's dismissal of plaintiffs' negligence claim because it arose out of postal employee's sexual indecencies with two minor girls while on his mail route and not as result of supervisor's purported negligence in allowing him to remain in position where he came into contact with children after he had pled guilty to similar sexual offense

Summary of this case from DOE PARENTS NO. 1 v. STATE, DEPT. OF ED

Opinion

No. 80-1812.

Submitted April 8, 1981.

Decided May 21, 1981.

Thomas S. Shadrick, Norfolk, Va. (Pender, Coward, Addison Morgan, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellants.

Marc Richman, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Thomas S. Martin, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Justin W. Williams, U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., Anthony J. Steinmeyer, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Before RUSSELL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District Judge.

The Honorable G. Ross Anderson, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.


These consolidated suits were brought by Gloria Hughes, as mother and next friend of infant sisters Jennifer and Stephanie Hughes, against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. Plaintiffs sought money damages for the alleged negligence of an employee of the United States Postal Service. The district court dismissed the suits, and we affirm.

Initially, an administrative tort claim was filed on behalf of Jennifer and Stephanie Hughes, but it was denied.

In 1974, postal employee Dennis Sullivan was arrested and charged under state law with luring a twelve year old girl into his vehicle for the purpose of taking indecent sexual liberties with her. At the time of the incident, Sullivan was dressed in his uniform but was between mail routes. He pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and was ordered to submit to psychiatric treatment. Shortly after the sentencing, the girl's father met with postal supervisor J. T. Crosswhite and requested that Sullivan be relieved of his delivery duties. The request was denied, and Sullivan was allowed to resume his job as a carrier.

On July 3, 1979 and July 6, 1979, Sullivan, while on his route, lured Jennifer and Stephanie Hughes into his postal truck and took indecent sexual liberties with them. These 1979 events form the bases of plaintiffs' claims that postal supervisor Crosswhite acted negligently in failing to relieve Sullivan of his delivery duties after the 1974 incident.

Sullivan was arrested and charged under state law with taking indecent liberties with children. Va. Code § 18.2-370. He pleaded guilty, was given a three year suspended sentence, and was ordered to continue psychiatric and religious counseling. He was joined originally as a defendant in these consolidated suits, but the cases against him were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

The Federal Tort Claims Act abolishes sovereign immunity by allowing the United States to be sued for money damages for

personal injury . . . caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.

28 U.S.C. § 1346(b).

Certain exceptions, however, have been made to the government's exposure to liability under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), one of which prevents the government from being held liable on "[a]ny claim arising out of assault [or] battery." 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h).

The district court dismissed the suits on the ground that the claims, although framed in terms of negligence, actually arose out of the assaults and batteries committed by Sullivan. The court concluded that government liability was thereby precluded under 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h).

After considering the record, briefs, and oral argument, we detect no erroneous finding of fact or conclusion of law warranting reversal of the district court's order. Accordingly, we affirm for reasons adequately stated by the district court. Hughes v. Sullivan, 514 F. Supp. 667 (E.D.Va. 1980).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hughes v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 21, 1981
662 F.2d 219 (4th Cir. 1981)

affirming district court's dismissal of plaintiffs' negligence claim because it arose out of postal employee's sexual indecencies with two minor girls while on his mail route and not as result of supervisor's purported negligence in allowing him to remain in position where he came into contact with children after he had pled guilty to similar sexual offense

Summary of this case from DOE PARENTS NO. 1 v. STATE, DEPT. OF ED

In Hughes we affirmed the district court's dismissal of a claim against the government because it fell within this exception.

Summary of this case from Sheridan v. U.S.

In Hughes we held that § 2680(h) barred the parents of two children who had been assaulted by a postal worker from suing the United States for the negligent supervision of the postman.

Summary of this case from Andrews v. United States

explaining that the applicability of an exception under § 2680 is a threshold question that can be determined by the court as a matter of law

Summary of this case from Madsen v. U.S. Post Office

In Hughes, a United States postal worker lured two children into his postal truck and took indecent sexual liberties with them.

Summary of this case from Doe v. United States

In Hughes, the Fourth Circuit held that the government could not be sued under the FTCA for any damages arising out of a postal worker's taking sexual liberties with children.

Summary of this case from Doe v. United States

In Hughes the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that plaintiffs' claim for negligent retention of a child molester in the position of mail carrier was in reality a suit for the intentional tort of assault and battery and thus barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h).

Summary of this case from Gale v. United States
Case details for

Hughes v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER JILL HUGHES AND STEPHANIE RACHEL HUGHES, INFANTS WHO SUE BY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 21, 1981

Citations

662 F.2d 219 (4th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Thigpen v. United States

The distinction was examined in Hughes v. Sullivan, 514 F. Supp. 667 (E.D.Va. 1980) aff'd sub nom. Hughes v.…

Shearer v. United States

Gibson v. U.S., 457 F.2d at 1395-96. See also Hughes v. Sullivan, 514 F. Supp. 667, 669-70 (E.D.Va. 1980),…