From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 18, 2003
861 So. 2d 1087 (Ala. 2003)

Opinion

No. 1010926.

Decided April 18, 2003.

Appeal from Calhoun Circuit Court (CV-01-29), R. Allen Crow, Judge.

Susan S. Wagner and W. Patton Hahn of Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom Kushner, P.C., Birmingham, for the appellant Hughes Beverage Company, Inc.

George A. Monk of Brooks, Harmon Monk, LLC, Anniston; and Carla Cole Gilmore of Kaufman Rothfelder, Montgomery, for appellee Louise Hughes, as personal Representative of the estate of Ravee Norris Hughes, deceased.

Kenneth J. Mendelsohn and Thomas E. James of Jemison, Mendelsohn James, P.C., Montgomery, for Mays Jemison, Mike Jemison, Jack Shallop, Sonny Cone, Don Motes and Kenneth Mendelsohn.


The plaintiff in this declaratory-judgment action, Hughes Beverage Company, Inc., petitioned, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., for permission to appeal from the denial of its motion for a summary judgment. This Court exercised its discretion and granted Hughes Beverage Company permission to appeal. However, after thoroughly reviewing the record and the arguments presented by the parties, we conclude that the permission to appeal under Rule 5, Ala.R.App.P., was improvidently granted, and we dismiss the appeal. State v. Bassett, 364 So.2d 1175 (Ala. 1978).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Alabama
Apr 18, 2003
861 So. 2d 1087 (Ala. 2003)
Case details for

Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:Hughes Beverage Company, Inc. v. Louise Hughes, as personal representative…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Apr 18, 2003

Citations

861 So. 2d 1087 (Ala. 2003)

Citing Cases

Continental Cas. Co. v. Pinkston

This Court granted Continental permission to appeal. After reviewing the record and considering the arguments…

Bronner v. Burks

After thoroughly reviewing the record and the arguments presented by the parties, we conclude that the…