From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huffman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 31, 2014
134 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC12–2400.

2014-01-31

David S. HUFFMAN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 152 Fla. 400, 11 So.2d 889, 890 (Fla.1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus “is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act”), approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla.1983). All other requests for relief made in the petition are also denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Huffman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 31, 2014
134 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Huffman v. State

Case Details

Full title:David S. HUFFMAN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jan 31, 2014

Citations

134 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 2014)