From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huebner v. Hammond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 18, 1903
69 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1903)

Summary

In Huebner v. Hammond, 177 N.Y. 537, 69 N.E. 1124, there is not sufficient statement of the case to tell whether it is applicable to the instant case.

Summary of this case from Foster Lumber Co. v. Rodgers

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1903

Decided December 18, 1903

Perry D. Trafford for appellant.

Frank C. Avery and Mark M. Schlesinger for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there was no proof of negligence to submit to the jury.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.


Summaries of

Huebner v. Hammond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 18, 1903
69 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1903)

In Huebner v. Hammond, 177 N.Y. 537, 69 N.E. 1124, there is not sufficient statement of the case to tell whether it is applicable to the instant case.

Summary of this case from Foster Lumber Co. v. Rodgers
Case details for

Huebner v. Hammond

Case Details

Full title:MARIE HUEBNER, as Administratrix of the Estate of OTTO HUEBNER, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 18, 1903

Citations

69 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1903)
69 N.E. 1124

Citing Cases

Foster Lumber Co. v. Rodgers

dence show any controverted question of fact on that subject The following authorities are presented by…