From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Rhodes

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 31, 1978
579 F.2d 46 (6th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-3019.

Argued June 22, 1978.

Decided July 31, 1978.

Louis A. Jacobs, Stanley K. Laughlin, Jr., Jerome D. Catanzaro, Clyde Ellis, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

William J. Brown, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Michael R. Grove, Earl M. Manz, Columbus, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio; Don J. Young, Judge.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and WEICK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.


Three male inmates of Ohio prisons and two women engaged to marry inmates filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin enforcement of an unwritten policy of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections which forbids the marriage of incarcerated persons. District Judge Don J. Young dismissed the action and plaintiffs appeal.

We affirm on authority of Johnson v. Rockefeller, 365 F. Supp. 377 (S.D.N.Y. 1973), aff'd sub nom. (without opinion) Butler v. Wilson, Governor of New York, 415 U.S. 953, 94 S.Ct. 1479, 39 L.Ed.2d 569 (1974); see also Polmaskitch v. United States, 436 F. Supp. 527 (W.D.Okl. 1977).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Rhodes

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 31, 1978
579 F.2d 46 (6th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

Hudson v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH HUDSON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JAMES A. RHODES ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 31, 1978

Citations

579 F.2d 46 (6th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Wool v. Hogan

Persuasive authority supports our position. The Sixth Circuit in a per curiam opinion held that Ohio's…

Salisbury v. List

Id. Some courts have upheld legislation or regulations that forbade marriage of prison inmates ( Hudson v.…