From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 23, 2002
828 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-102

Opinion filed October 23, 2002

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County. N. Sanders Sauls, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant seeks review of his conviction for felony possession of marijuana. He argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We agree. Because the state failed to present evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case on the element of guilty knowledge — i.e., that appellant knew of the presence of the marijuana and its illicit nature — the trial court should have granted the motion for a judgment of acquittal. See, e.g., Scott v. State, 808 So.2d 166 (Fla. 2002); Chicone v. State, 684 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1996); Rutskin v. State, 260 So.2d 525 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court vacate the judgment of conviction and order placing appellant on probation and enter a judgment of acquittal.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 23, 2002
828 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Hubbard v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS W. HUBBARD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 23, 2002

Citations

828 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Laine v. State

Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court vacate the judgment of conviction and order…