From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Pac. Reclamation Water Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 17, 2012
381 P.3d 621 (Nev. 2012)

Summary

concluding privity existed between prior owner of water rights and its successor-in-interest

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Carson Valley United Methodist Church

Opinion

No. 57004.

04-17-2012

Michael T. HOWELL; and Cheri A. Howell, Appellants, v. PACIFIC RECLAMATION WATER COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation; and Metropolis Water Irrigation District, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada, Respondents.

Wilson Barrows & Salyer, Ltd. Goicoechea, Di Grazia, Coyle & Stanton, Ltd.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Howell v. Pac. Reclamation Water Co.

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Apr 17, 2012
381 P.3d 621 (Nev. 2012)

concluding privity existed between prior owner of water rights and its successor-in-interest

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Carson Valley United Methodist Church
Case details for

Howell v. Pac. Reclamation Water Co.

Case Details

Full title:Michael T. HOWELL; and Cheri A. Howell, Appellants, v. PACIFIC RECLAMATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 621 (Nev. 2012)

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Carson Valley United Methodist Church

) Because CVUMC and A3 Energy were parties to the Nevada Proceeding, and because Nelson is a…