From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1983
301 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

65776.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1983.

Aggravated assault. Colquitt Superior Court. Before Judge Horkan.

Thomas L. Kirbo III, for appellant.

H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, James B. Thagard, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Eddie James Howard appeals his conviction of two counts of aggravated assault. The evidence showed that Joe Norman and Debbie Horne arrived at the home of Greg and Kim Hall on the evening of May 2, 1982. At one point during the evening, the two couples decided to obtain a quantity of marijuana and left in search of it in Norman's pickup truck to a location in northwest Moultrie where they met Clarence Trimble. With Trimble's aid, they went in search of Howard, who was a known seller of marijuana. Eventually they arrived at a location near the "Blue Room," a cafe, where they met appellant, discussed purchasing the drug from him, and a dispute arose over the price. During the argument, Howard exhibited a pistol which was tucked into the front of his pants. Trimble ran in the direction of his mother's house and when he began to return, Howard fired several shots at him. The last shot hit Kim Hall in the head as she sat in the truck. There was no evidence that anyone else had a gun. Held:

1. The verdict was supported by the evidence and the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for a directed verdict. "A defendant is entitled to a directed verdict only where there is no conflict in the evidence, and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom, demands a verdict of not guilty." Causey v. State, 154 Ga. App. 76, 77 ( 267 S.E.2d 475) (1980). A directed verdict of acquittal was not demanded in the present case. The credibility of the witnesses is a question of fact for the jury. Redd v. State, 154 Ga. App. 373 ( 268 S.E.2d 423) (1980). From the evidence presented at trial, a rational trier of fact could find that Howard was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 ( 263 S.E.2d 131) (1980).

2. A description of the injuries sustained by Kim Hall was admissible to prove that the pistol used by the appellant was a deadly weapon. Clarke v. State, 149 Ga. App. 641 ( 255 S.E.2d 110) (1979); Haygood v. State, 142 Ga. App. 627, 629 ( 236 S.E.2d 696) (1977).

3. The court did not err in charging the jury that the sale of marijuana is a felony after charging that a person is not justified in using force if he "is attempting to commit, committing, or fleeing after the commission of a felony." This portion of the charge tracks OCGA § 16-3-21 (b) (2) (Code Ann. §§ 26-902, 27-207). The evidence showed that the appellant sold a "nickel" bag of marijuana to Kim Hall's friends for six dollars. By charging the jury that the sale of marijuana constitutes a felony, the court was simply charging the jury on the applicable law.

Judgment affirmed. Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1983.


Summaries of

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1983
301 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Howard v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 25, 1983

Citations

301 S.E.2d 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
301 S.E.2d 910

Citing Cases

White v. State

Holmes v. State, 273 Ga. 644, 646 (3) ( 543 SE2d 688) (2001).Howard v. State, 165 Ga. App. 555, 555-556 (3) (…

Thomas v. State

In his first enumeration defendant maintains the trial court erred in denying his "motion for judgment of…