From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hovey v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1911
147 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

December 29, 1911.

Charles E. Rushmore, for the appellant.

Lester S. Kafer, for the respondent.

Present — INGRAHAM, P.J., LAUGHLIN, CLARKE, SCOTT and MILLER, JJ. MILLER and SCOTT, JJ., dissented.


For the reasons stated in the prevailing opinion, herewith handed down, in Hovey v. De Long Hook Eye Co. ( 147 App. Div. 881) the determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.


Determination affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Hovey v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1911
147 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Hovey v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:LE ROY F. HOVEY, Respondent, v . THOMAS D. RICHARDSON, JR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1911

Citations

147 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)