From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Kentucky Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 17, 1960
336 S.W.2d 547 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

December 18, 1959. As Extended on Rehearing June 17, 1960.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Franklin County, W.B. Ardery, J.

James C. Ware (Ware Ware), Covington, for appellant.

Bradford T. Garrison, Department of Revenue, Frankfort, for appellee.


The sole question raised in this appeal is whether the Department of Revenue has properly assessed certain bank shares for inheritance tax purposes. Exclusive of interest and costs the amount in controversy is $456.20, that being the protested portion of the taxes as finally certified. There is no motion that an appeal be granted. Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to entertain one.

This case involves a question of valuation only. There being no actual issue of constitutional or statutory principle, Commonwealth ex rel. Allphin v. Sandmann, Ky., 280 S.W.2d 155, does not apply. We have, however, examined the record and the contentions made by appellant and, if we had jurisdiction, would not be inclined to reverse the judgment, since there was sufficient evidence of comparable sales, independent of the controversial formula employed by the Department, to sustain its valuations.

For the reasons thus expressed the appeal is being dismissed sua sponte.


Summaries of

Houston v. Kentucky Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 17, 1960
336 S.W.2d 547 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Houston v. Kentucky Tax Commission

Case Details

Full title:Erma Roberts HOUSTON, Executrix of the Estate of Elizabeth Frances…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jun 17, 1960

Citations

336 S.W.2d 547 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Webb v. Webb

There is no provision in either the statute or the rules that would permit a circuit court to relieve an…

Travis v. Kentucky Bd. of Tax Appeals

We are dismissing the appeal because we are of the opinion that the amount in controversy is simply the…