From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houseknecht v. Gettins

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 15, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-256 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 15, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-256.

January 15, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 15th day of January 2009, after the Plaintiff, Jamie Houseknecht, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Dismiss was filed by the Defendant, James Troutman, and after a Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on behalf of each of the remaining Defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that these Motions be granted, and after giving the Plaintiff an extension until December 31, 2008 to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed to the Report and Recommendation, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Troutman's motion to dismiss [Dkt. 63] is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Dkt. 56] is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Houseknecht v. Gettins

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 15, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-256 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Houseknecht v. Gettins

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE HOUSEKNECHT, Plaintiff v. CANDICE GETTINS; JACK LOUGHRY; DAVID…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-256 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 15, 2009)