From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houghton Mifflin Co. v. RPM, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 13, 1982
294 Md. 331 (Md. 1982)

Summary

holding that the sheriffs’ law enforcement duties are executive in nature

Summary of this case from Thornton Mellon, LLC v. Frederick Cnty. Sheriff

Opinion

September Term, 1982

Decided September 13, 1982


Pet. Docket No. 231 — granted Opinion (No. 1314, 1981 Term) unreported.


Summaries of

Houghton Mifflin Co. v. RPM, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Sep 13, 1982
294 Md. 331 (Md. 1982)

holding that the sheriffs’ law enforcement duties are executive in nature

Summary of this case from Thornton Mellon, LLC v. Frederick Cnty. Sheriff

noting that "neither statutory language nor legislative intent can be stretched beyond the fair implication of the statute's words or its purpose."

Summary of this case from Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. Holmes
Case details for

Houghton Mifflin Co. v. RPM, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN CO. v. RPM, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Sep 13, 1982

Citations

294 Md. 331 (Md. 1982)
449 A.2d 1158

Citing Cases

Shah v. Howard County

In affirming the summary judgment granted to Montgomery County by the circuit court, we observed that the…

Rucker v. Harford County

" See e.g., Soper v. Montgomery County, 294 Md. 331, 337, 449 A.2d 1158 (1982); Green v. State, 122 Md. 288,…