From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houghtaling v. Tirado-Montes

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Sep 2, 2008
Case No. 8:03-CV-2733-T-30EAJ (M.D. Fla. Sep. 2, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 8:03-CV-2733-T-30EAJ.

September 2, 2008


ORDER


THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Notice of Joint Stipulation for Dismissal in which Plaintiff and Defendants have stipulated that this action be dismissed with prejudice (Dkt. 105).

Rule 41 provides, in pertinent part, that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Rule 41(a)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. "Ordinarily, a Rule 41(a)(1) voluntary dismissal is effective immediately and requires no action by the district court." See University of So. Ala. v. The American Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d 405 409 (11th Cir. 1999) (finding that a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is generally self-executing).

ACCORDINGLY, the Court ORDERS that:

1. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1).
2. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Houghtaling v. Tirado-Montes

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Sep 2, 2008
Case No. 8:03-CV-2733-T-30EAJ (M.D. Fla. Sep. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Houghtaling v. Tirado-Montes

Case Details

Full title:DION L. HOUGHTALING, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO F. TIRADO-MONTES; P. BAILEY; P…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Sep 2, 2008

Citations

Case No. 8:03-CV-2733-T-30EAJ (M.D. Fla. Sep. 2, 2008)