From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Addy

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 4, 1994
69 Ohio St. 3d 181 (Ohio 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-592

Submitted March 30, 1994 —

Decided May 4, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 13524.

E.S. Gallon Associates and David M. Deutsch, for appellants.

Freund, Freeze Arnold, Patrick J. Janis and Fredric L. Young, for appellees.

Wolske Blue and Gerald S. Leeseberg, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Frost Jacobs, Grant S. Cowan and Gregory A. Keyser, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys.

Lang Donoff, Marilyn R. Donoff and Paul W. Mills, urging affirmance for amici curiae, Auto Club Insurance Company and Nevin Gross.


The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final appealable order. The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Horton v. Addy

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 4, 1994
69 Ohio St. 3d 181 (Ohio 1994)
Case details for

Horton v. Addy

Case Details

Full title:HORTON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. ADDY ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 4, 1994

Citations

69 Ohio St. 3d 181 (Ohio 1994)
631 N.E.2d 123

Citing Cases

Walters v. the Enrichment Ctr.

"Rulings by a trial court on demands for discovery (whether granting or denying the demand) are not orders…

State ex Rel. Steckman v. Jackson

Rulings by a trial court on demands for discovery (whether granting or denying the demand) are not orders…