From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horowitz v. Scheinkopf

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 1, 1927
129 Misc. 211 (N.Y. App. Term 1927)

Opinion

April 1, 1927.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Sullivan Klein [ Eugene Bernard Sullivan of counsel], for the appellant.

Harris Greenberg [ Louis S. Harris of counsel], for the respondent.


The court erred in failing to give proper effect to the two proceedings instituted in April, 1926, for the non-payment of the rent by defendant of premises in question. The final orders in those proceedings are conclusive as to the existence of the relation of landlord and tenant between the parties, the occupation of the tenant, the terms and nature thereof, and that some rent was due and unpaid.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint.

All concur. Present — LYDON, LEVY and CRAIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Horowitz v. Scheinkopf

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 1, 1927
129 Misc. 211 (N.Y. App. Term 1927)
Case details for

Horowitz v. Scheinkopf

Case Details

Full title:ALICE HOROWITZ, Appellant, v. NATHAN SCHEINKOPF, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1927

Citations

129 Misc. 211 (N.Y. App. Term 1927)
221 N.Y.S. 113

Citing Cases

Simms v. Bovee

That being so, the law is clear, as enunciated by many decisions that the purchaser had no right to demand…