From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horel v. Valdovinos

U.S.
Jan 24, 2011
562 U.S. 1196 (2011)

Summary

holding claim of ineffective assistance alleged in amended petition related back to claim of ineffective assistance alleged in original petition where both claims pertained to counsel's alleged failure to adequately investigate suppressed exculpatory evidence, and amended claim "simply add[ed] more evidence that counsel did not uncover"

Summary of this case from Watkins v. Gonzalez

Opinion

No. 10–136.

01-24-2011

Robert HOREL, Warden, petitioner, v. Felix Solorio VALDOVINOS.


Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 770, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2011).


Summaries of

Horel v. Valdovinos

U.S.
Jan 24, 2011
562 U.S. 1196 (2011)

holding claim of ineffective assistance alleged in amended petition related back to claim of ineffective assistance alleged in original petition where both claims pertained to counsel's alleged failure to adequately investigate suppressed exculpatory evidence, and amended claim "simply add[ed] more evidence that counsel did not uncover"

Summary of this case from Watkins v. Gonzalez
Case details for

Horel v. Valdovinos

Case Details

Full title:WARDEN HOREL v. FELIX S. VALDOVINOS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

Citations

562 U.S. 1196 (2011)
131 S. Ct. 1042
178 L. Ed. 2d 860

Citing Cases

Zanini v. Baker

Valdovinos v. McGrath, 598 F.3d 568, 575 (9th Cir. 2010) (emphasis added), vacated on other grounds sub nom.…

Watkins v. Gonzalez

Further, this is not a case where petitioner's new claims do no more than allege additional facts that would…