From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopper v. Hopper

Appellate Court of Illinois
May 14, 1942
314 Ill. App. 572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

Gen. No. 9,747. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 14, 1942

HUSBAND AND WIFE, § 206separate maintenance, decree settling rights. Testimony considered and that part of the decree awarding separate maintenance affirmed, and portions of the decree awarding title to the furniture and furnishings to wife and ordering husband to pay the indebtedness thereon, debts of a tavern operated by husband and wife, and allowing solicitor's fees, reversed (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, ch. 68, par. 22; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 109.189).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Kankakee county; Hon. LUTHER B. BRATTON, presiding.

Reversed in part and remanded with directions. Heard in this court at February term, 1942.

Shapiro Lauridsen, for appellant;

Victor Lauridsen, of counsel;

Victor N. Cardosi and Donald Gray, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed May 14, 1942.


Summaries of

Hopper v. Hopper

Appellate Court of Illinois
May 14, 1942
314 Ill. App. 572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Hopper v. Hopper

Case Details

Full title:Florence Hopper, Appellee, v. Edward Hopper, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: May 14, 1942

Citations

314 Ill. App. 572 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
41 N.E.2d 786

Citing Cases

Boyd v. Boyd

No doubt it is the usual rule that in a separate maintenance suit that property rights should not be adjusted…

Ribergaard v. Ribergaard

No doubt it is the usual rule that in a separate maintenance suit that property rights should not be adjusted…