From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 18, 1950
276 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

January 18, 1950.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: While we are of the opinion that the agreements of adjustment do not constitute evidence of the price upon any sale, under the provisions of section 16 CTC of the Court of Claims Act, and were improperly received upon the issue of the value of claimant's property, there was other sufficient competent evidence of the value of claimant's land to sustain the award made by the Court of Claims. All concur. (The judgment appealed from is for claimant on a claim for appropriation of land.)


Summaries of

Hopkins v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 18, 1950
276 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Hopkins v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:CARL C. HOPKINS, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 18, 1950

Citations

276 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Ritter

The remaining evidence, including that of other sales received without objection, sufficiently sustains the…

Long Island RR Co. v. State of New York

Accordingly, no allowance can be made to this claimant for its noncarrier lands utilized in the elimination,…