From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 2011
82 A.D.3d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Summary

In Hopkins v. New York City Transit Auth., 917 N.Y.S.2d 866 (1st Dep't 2011), the appellate court affirmed the jury's award of $350,000 for past pain and suffering, where the plaintiff sustained an ankle fracture which required two surgeries — one to insert a metal plate and screws and another to remove them.

Summary of this case from Tookes v. Port Authority of New York New Jersey

Opinion

No. 4433.

March 3, 2011.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered December 14, 2009, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff $350,000 for past pain and suffering and $275,000 for future pain and suffering for 55.4 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Anita Isola of counsel), for appellant.

Fischer and Burnstein, P.C., Kew Gardens (Steven Herschkowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


The 22-year-old plaintiff suffered a trimalleolar fracture of her right ankle when she tripped and fell on a section of cracked and raised concrete in a subway station. She has endured two painful surgeries, one open insertion to repair her broken bones by means of a metal plate and screws, and a second to remove the surgical hardware. She can no longer run or participate in sports and continues to have pain. Early signs of arthritis, which is likely to further restrict her motion and activities, have been detected in her ankle, which may require an additional surgery. Under these circumstances, the amounts awarded for past and future pain and suffering do not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation ( see e.g. Colon v New York Eye Surgery Assoc., P.C., 77 AD3d 597; Ruiz v Hart Elm Corp., 44 AD3d 842; Rydell v Fan Am. Equities, 262 AD2d 213; Fo Yee So v Wing Tat Realty, 259 AD2d 373; CPLR 5501 [c]).


Summaries of

Hopkins v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 2011
82 A.D.3d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

In Hopkins v. New York City Transit Auth., 917 N.Y.S.2d 866 (1st Dep't 2011), the appellate court affirmed the jury's award of $350,000 for past pain and suffering, where the plaintiff sustained an ankle fracture which required two surgeries — one to insert a metal plate and screws and another to remove them.

Summary of this case from Tookes v. Port Authority of New York New Jersey

In Hopkins v. New York City Transit Auth., 917 N.Y.S.2d 866 (1st Dep't 2011), the appellate court affirmed the jury's award of $350,000 for past pain and suffering, where the plaintiff sustained an ankle fracture which required two surgeries — one to insert a metal plate and screws and another to remove them.

Summary of this case from Tookes v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & New Jersey
Case details for

Hopkins v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:MEGHAN HOPKINS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1603
917 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

Tookes v. Port Authority of New York New Jersey

In Hopkins v. New York City Transit Auth., 917 N.Y.S.2d 866 (1st Dep't 2011), the appellate court affirmed…

Tookes v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & New Jersey

In Hopkins v. New York City Transit Auth., 917 N.Y.S.2d 866 (1st Dep't 2011), the appellate court affirmed…