From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Crisp

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1913
78 S.E. 275 (N.C. 1913)

Opinion

(Filed 28 May, 1913.)

Evidence — Issues of Fact — Questions for Jury.

This cause presenting a controversy of fact properly presented to the jury, no error is found.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Lane, J., at Spring Term, 1912, of CHEROKEE. Action tried upon this issue:

M. W. Bell, J. H. Dillard, and Zebulon Weaver for plaintiffs.

A. D. Raby, J. N. Moody, and R. L. Phillips for defendants.


(1) "Is the land claimed by plaintiffs, Tract No. 1949, located as shown on the plat, and as contended by plaintiffs? Answer: Yes.

From the judgment rendered, defendant appealed.


We have examined the record in this case and considered the several assignments of error, and we find no reversible error. The controversy appears to be almost exclusively one of fact, and we think the court properly presented it to the jury.

No error.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Crisp

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1913
78 S.E. 275 (N.C. 1913)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Crisp

Case Details

Full title:W. R. HOPKINS ET AL. v. J. M. CRISP ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1913

Citations

78 S.E. 275 (N.C. 1913)
162 N.C. 528