From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hope v. Peterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1916
90 S.E. 257 (N.C. 1916)

Opinion

(Filed 11 October, 1916.)

Executors and Administrators — Parent and Child — Wrongful Death — Parties.

An action to recover for the wrongful death of a son must be brought by the executor or administrator of the deceased, and not by his father.

THIS is an action brought by the father to recover damages for (870) the wrongful death of his infant son.

No counsel for plaintiff.

Grady Graham, Butler Herring, and Fowler Crumpler for defendants.


The defendants filed a demurrer, which was overruled, and the defendants appealed.


The defendant moves in this Court to dismiss the action because it is brought in the name of the father and not by the executor or administrator of the son, and the motion must be sustained.

The case of Killian v. R. R., 128 N.C. 261, decides the exact question in favor of the defendant.

Action dismissed.

Cited: Hinnant v. Power Co., 189 N.C. 122 (c); Brown v. R. R., 202 N.C. 262 (c); White v. Comrs. of Johnston, 217 N.C. 333 (1).


Summaries of

Hope v. Peterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1916
90 S.E. 257 (N.C. 1916)
Case details for

Hope v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:W. H. HOPE v. J. R. PETERSON ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1916

Citations

90 S.E. 257 (N.C. 1916)
172 N.C. 869

Citing Cases

Hinnant v. Power Co.

In accordance with this principle, it has been held that a widow has no individual right of action for the…

Gibson v. Campbell

White v. Comrs. of Johnston, 217 N.C. 329, 7 S.E.2d 825 (1940). Accordingly, when death results…