From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hope Clinic v. Ryan

U.S.
Jun 29, 2000
530 U.S. 1271 (2000)

Summary

restricting Mr. Cotner from filing further petitions for writ of certiorari in civil matters unless he has paid a docketing fee and submitted the petition in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 33.1

Summary of this case from Cotner v. Known & Unknown Drug Cartel Members

Opinion

No. 99-1152.

June 29, 2000.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Stenberg v. Carhart, ante, p. 914. Reported below: 195 F. 3d 857.


Summaries of

Hope Clinic v. Ryan

U.S.
Jun 29, 2000
530 U.S. 1271 (2000)

restricting Mr. Cotner from filing further petitions for writ of certiorari in civil matters unless he has paid a docketing fee and submitted the petition in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 33.1

Summary of this case from Cotner v. Known & Unknown Drug Cartel Members
Case details for

Hope Clinic v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:HOPE CLINIC ET AL. v. RYAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ILLINOIS, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 29, 2000

Citations

530 U.S. 1271 (2000)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Huffman

Apprendi held that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the maximum penalty to which a…

Parrado v. U.S.

See 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Parrado also attempts to rely on Jones v. United…