From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Dreja

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 12, 2012
381 P.3d 621 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58808.

06-12-2012

Daniel HOOD, Appellant, v. Lora DREJA, Respondent.

Sterling Law, LLC Black & LoBello


Sterling Law, LLC

Black & LoBello

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order concerning a motion to set aside portions of a divorce decree. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cynthia N. Giuliani, Judge.

When our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we directed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In particular, the order appealed from expressly scheduled an evidentiary hearing and directed briefing on issues concerning the parties' SEP IRA and 401K accounts. NRAP 3A(b)(l) and (8) ; Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) (holding that a final, appealable judgment adjudicates the rights and liabilities of the parties and disposes of all of the issues presented in the case and that attorney fees and costs orders are appealable post-judgment orders). In response to our show cause order, appellant concurs that the appeal is premature, as issues remain pending in the district court, and thus, a final, appealable judgment has not been entered. As this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Hood v. Dreja

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 12, 2012
381 P.3d 621 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Hood v. Dreja

Case Details

Full title:Daniel HOOD, Appellant, v. Lora DREJA, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 621 (Nev. 2012)