From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 630 (N.Y. 1971)

Opinion

Argued July 6, 1971

Decided July 7, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, T. PAUL KANE, J.

William R. Jubic, County Attorney, for appellant.

Marvin I. Honig for plaintiff-respondent.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Robert W. Imrie, Ruth Kessler Toch and Jack W. Hoffman of counsel), for State of New York, respondent.

James T. Ronan for John A. Murphy, intervenor-respondent.

Carl W. Engstrom, Corporation Counsel, for City of Troy, intervenor-respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 630 (N.Y. 1971)
Case details for

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

Case Details

Full title:NEDDA R. HONIG, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Residents of the County…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1971

Citations

29 N.Y.2d 630 (N.Y. 1971)
324 N.Y.S.2d 417
273 N.E.2d 143

Citing Cases

Brooklyn Assn. v. Macchiarola

We do not dispute the fact that keeping census tabulation blocks intact is preferable when district voting…

Valentino v. County of Tompkins

In addition, the County's redistricting plan is governed by the County Charter, not by the provisions of the…