From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Alleghany Corp.

U.S.
Apr 18, 1966
384 U.S. 28 (1966)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 131.

Argued March 21, 1966. Decided April 18, 1966.

Together with No. 132, Holt et al. v. Kirby et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

No. 131, 344 F.2d 571; No. 132, 340 F.2d 311, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Stuart N. Updike argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs were Lee W. Meyer, Ronald S. Daniels and Richard J. Barnes.

Mark F. Hughes and Walter R. Mansfield argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With Mr. Hughes on the brief for respondent Alleghany Corp. were Allan F. Conwill and Vincent R. FitzPatrick. With Mr. Mansfield on the briefs for respondent Allan P. Kirby were Eugene v. Rostow and Breck P. McAllister; for respondent Fred M. Kirby were John E. Tobin and Ben Vinar; and for respondent Ireland were Eugene v. Rostow and John J. McCann.

Simon v. Haberman filed a brief for Randolph Phillips in No. 132, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.



The writs of certiorari are dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents from dismissal of the writs and would reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals and district courts substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Friendly's dissent in the Court of Appeals, 333 F.2d 327, 338.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent from the dismissal of the writs, believing that these cases having been taken for review should be adjudicated on the merits.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.


Summaries of

Holt v. Alleghany Corp.

U.S.
Apr 18, 1966
384 U.S. 28 (1966)
Case details for

Holt v. Alleghany Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HOLT ET AL. v . ALLEGHANY CORP. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 18, 1966

Citations

384 U.S. 28 (1966)
86 S. Ct. 1250

Citing Cases

Tyson v. Cayton

plaintiffs' argument is, in essence, that where the parties have sought to settle a claim of fraud, they…

Phillips v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.

At an earlier stage of the controversy, over 12 years ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second…